Under the strategy, coupled with a pollinator research
action plan, EPA will continue its effort to better understand and reduce risks
of the controversial neonicotinoid pesticides, which advocates argue pose a
persistent risk to bees because they are systemic, meaning the chemical is
taken up into plants' pollen and nectar.
EPA will also accelerate a Federal Insecticide, Fungicide
and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) registration review of four neonicotinoids, and
craft new testing guidelines for improving studies of pesticides' risks to
bees. The report states that “Mitigating
the effects of pesticides on bees is a priority for the Federal government, as both
bee pollination and insect control are essential to the success of agriculture…
It is the misuse and overuse of these pesticides that leads to adverse
ecological and human health consequences.”
The strategy stops short of environmentalists' calls for a
ban on neonicotinoids.
EPA and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) have been
working for years to stem declines in pollinators seen since 2006. In 2013, EPA and USDA blamed bee declines on
a variety of factors, including declining habitat and genetic diversity, as
well as exposure to pesticides and the varroa mite, a common bee parasite. In yesterday’s released report and the
companion research action plan, federal officials say it remains unclear how
the various factors, individually and collectively, affect bee health and that
additional research is necessary.
On pesticides that could pose a risk to pollinators, the
strategy outlines an action plan for EPA to research and reduce risks of
pesticides to bees and other pollinators, especially the monarch butterfly.
This month, EPA will issue for public comment a proposed ban
on foliar applications, during bloom, of pesticides deemed acutely toxic to
bees at sites where bees are under contract for pollination services. The
proposed measures will include advisory statements and enforceable label
language. “Application of a toxic pesticide in this scenario is near certain to
result in adverse effects to pollinators,” the strategy says.
To reduce acute exposures in other situations, the strategy
calls for encouraging and assisting state regulators in crafting pollinator
protection plans based on improving coordination and communication between
beekeepers and pesticide applicators. State regulators have said they are
wrestling with how to define the scope and success of plans they are crafting
that aim to reduce bees' exposures to pesticides after regulators dropped language
from draft pollinator guidance that said EPA would review and approve state
strategies.
To address risks to bees from systemic pesticides, including
potential sub-lethal effects, the strategy says EPA will issue new exposure and
effect study protocols for federally-supported studies. The protocols are to
support EPA's already ongoing implementation of a new pollinator risk
assessment framework released last year.
The framework seeks to better assess risks of pesticides to
pollinators, such as potential sub-lethal effects to bees that could then
weaken an entire hive. EPA in previous statements has acknowledged that
traditional pollinator risk assessments have failed to adequately consider
those potential risks.
The strategy also calls for EPA to further expedite its
FIFRA registration review of four common neonicotinoid pesticides:
imidacloprid, clothianidin, dinotefuran and thiamethoxam for completion in the
2016-2017 time frame. In 2013, EPA officials said they had accelerated
registration review of certain neonicotinoids, though some of the reviews,
which rely on studies that can take years, were still expected to stretch until
2018-2019.
Under the plan, EPA also commits to proposing for public
comment a framework for improving the health of monarch butterflies, and
suggests future regulatory action on multiple herbicides, which could reduce
milkweed on which the butterflies depend. That proposal appears to respond to
the Natural Resources Defense Council's petition early last year, asking EPA to
review risks of the herbicide glyphosate, commonly used with genetically-modified
crops, to address concerns the substance depletes milkweed and thereby harms
monarchs.
EPA acknowledges it has a responsibility under FIFRA to
protect milkweed, and says the plant may be affected by multiple herbicide
compounds. The agency therefore will conduct qualitative and quantitative
reviews of substances' risks and benefits for milkweed, rather than following
the typical single-chemical approach. “EPA anticipates that a number of actions
could be taken to protect monarch butterflies, ranging from changes to
pesticide label instructions, to spray drift buffers from critical milkweed
resources, to best management practices,” the plan says.
NAAA met with EPA officials in March about the
status of the Federal Pollinator Strategy to communicate to the agency the
numerous technologies and educational programs within the aerial application
industry to mitigate drift in an effort to ensure aerial application wasn’t
isolated and targeted as a cause of pollinator decline. The strategy, which again can be found here,
does not mention specific forms of application as a cause of pollinator decline.
Yesterday, a federal task force released a strategy to
protect bees and other pollinators and includes a slew of EPA actions, such as proposing
limits on highly toxic pesticides, promoting state efforts to reduce harm to
pollinators, and expediting reviews of potentially harmful pesticides. The White House released the National
Strategy to Promote the Health of Honey Bees and Other Pollinators which sets
goals of restoring honey bee colony health to sustainable levels by 2025;
increase Eastern monarch butterfly populations to 225 million butterflies by
2020; and restore or enhance seven million acres of land for bees and other
pollinators over the next five years. The plans responds to a memo from
President Obama issued in June 2014 tasking agencies with devising ways to
protect pollinators.